The director of the new film Poor Things, Andrea Arnold, has explained why she did not cast Emma Watson in the lead role. Arnold said that Watson was not right for the role because she is too “polished” and “sweet.”
The film is based on the novel of the same name by Alasdair Gray. The novel tells the story of Bella Baxter, a young woman who is brought back to life after being drowned. Bella is a wild and unpredictable character, and Arnold said that she needed an actress who could embody her raw sexuality and energy.
Watson is known for her roles in films such as the Harry Potter series and Little Women. Arnold said that Watson is a “great actress,” but that she is “too ‘polite'” and “too ‘perfect'” for the role of Bella Baxter.
Arnold said that she was looking for an actress who was “more rough around the edges” and who could “bring a bit of danger” to the role. She eventually cast Margaret Qualley in the lead role.
Arnold’s decision to not cast Watson in the lead role is significant because it highlights the different ways that women are portrayed in film. Watson is often seen as the epitome of a “good girl.” She is polite, intelligent, and well-behaved. Arnold, on the other hand, was looking for an actress who could portray a more complex and nuanced female character.
Related articles
Arnold’s decision is also significant because it shows that there is still a lack of diversity in Hollywood. Watson is a white, British actress. Arnold was looking for an actress who could bring a different perspective to the role. Qualley is an American actress who has spoken out about her experiences with sexual assault.
Arnold’s decision to not cast Watson in the lead role is a reminder that Hollywood needs to do more to promote diversity and inclusion. It is also a reminder that women are complex and multifaceted creatures. They cannot be reduced to simple stereotypes.
Analysis:
Andrea Arnold’s decision to not cast Emma Watson in the lead role of Poor Things is significant for a number of reasons. First, it highlights the different ways that women are portrayed in film. Watson is often seen as the epitome of a “good girl.” She is polite, intelligent, and well-behaved. Arnold, on the other hand, was looking for an actress who could portray a more complex and nuanced female character.
Second, Arnold’s decision shows that there is still a lack of diversity in Hollywood. Watson is a white, British actress. Arnold was looking for an actress who could bring a different perspective to the role. Qualley is an American actress who has spoken out about her experiences with sexual assault.
Third, Arnold’s decision is a reminder that Hollywood needs to do more to promote diversity and inclusion. It is also a reminder that women are complex and multifaceted creatures. They cannot be reduced to simple stereotypes.
Arnold’s decision is also significant because it raises questions about the role of directors in Hollywood. Directors are often seen as the final arbiters of taste. They have the power to decide who is cast in their films and how their films are made. Arnold’s decision to not cast Watson in the lead role is a reminder that directors have a responsibility to use their power to promote diversity and inclusion.
Discussion about this post