Santos vs. Kimmel: Lawsuit Erupts Over Prank Cameo Videos
Former congressman George Santos (R-N.Y.) has escalated his legal battle with late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, filing a lawsuit seeking $750,000 in damages over prank Cameo videos used on Kimmel’s show. This follows previous demands and threats that saw Kimmel double down on the humor.
The Prank and its Aftermath:
- After facing expulsion from Congress, Santos started offering personalized videos on Cameo for $500 each.
- Kimmel’s “Will Santos Say It?” segment used fake names and requests to trick Santos into reading absurd messages (e.g., congratulating someone on cloning their dog named Adolf).
- Santos initially demanded $20,000, escalating to a lawsuit seeking copyright infringement, fraud, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.
Legal Showdown Heats Up:
- Santos claims Kimmel used “deceitful tactics” and violated his rights.
- His lawyer argues “comedy is wonderful until you violate someone’s rights.”
- Kimmel’s representatives haven’t commented yet.
From $20k to $750k: A Escalating Demand:
- Santos initially threatened a $20,000 lawsuit, prompting Kimmel to air more prank videos.
- Now, the damage claim has jumped significantly to $750,000.
Beyond the Prank: Santos’ History of Fabrications:
- Santos’ lawsuit raises questions about personal and legal boundaries in humor.
- The controversy comes amidst numerous documented lies and fabricated narratives in Santos’ background.
- He even admitted to misusing campaign funds for personal expenses.
Social Media Sparring:
- Santos posted about the lawsuit on X, claiming Kimmel violated several laws and rights.
- He also used a harsh phrase suggesting potential retaliation.
Questions Remain:
- Will Kimmel respond to the lawsuit?
- How will the courts address the copyright and legal claims?
- Will this further damage Santos’ already tarnished reputation?
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for any legal matters.
Discussion about this post