The legal saga surrounding the late King of Pop, , continues to unfold as his production company, MJJ Productions, pushes back against what they deem as “unreasonable and oppressive” demands from the singer’s accusers to unseal sensitive police records.
In a dramatic turn of events, Jackson’s team filed a motion with the Superior Court of Los Angeles on Wednesday, vehemently opposing Wade Robson and James Safechuck’s subpoena requesting access to documents containing “photographs of Michael Jackson’s genitalia and naked body taken by police.” The court documents, obtained exclusively by Page Six, reveal the intense legal battle brewing behind the scenes.
According to MJJ Productions, the requested documents, dating back to 1993, are already “sealed by a court-entered protective order from the Santa Barbara Superior Court,” emphasizing the highly sensitive and private nature of the materials in question. Jackson’s attorneys argue that California law recognizes privacy rights to images of deceased persons, slamming the accusers’ demands as a blatant violation of Jackson’s privacy rights and an attempt to disturb his family’s peace of mind.
The legal wrangling intensifies as Jackson’s legal team asserts that Robson and Safechuck have made repeated attempts in the past to obtain the sealed documents, all of which were quashed by the court. Furthermore, they argue that the contents of these documents are not directly relevant to the case, labeling the accusers’ demands as an exploitation of a discredited criminal investigation.
Related articles
Robson and Safechuck, whose allegations gained widespread attention following the release of HBO’s “Leaving Neverland” documentary in 2019, have filed lawsuits against Jackson’s companies, alleging complicity in the alleged abuse. Despite previous dismissals of their claims, a California judge ruled in August 2023 that they would have their day in court, setting the stage for a potentially explosive legal showdown.
As the legal battle rages on, the legacy of Michael Jackson hangs in the balance, with his estate and production company fiercely defending his reputation against what they perceive as unfounded and sensational claims. With a trial date yet to be set, the world watches eagerly as this high-profile case unfolds, leaving a lasting impact on the intersection of fame, justice, and pop culture.
Discussion about this post