The war between Leah Remini and the Church of Scientology just got even uglier. In a dramatic twist, a judge recently tossed out a major chunk of Remini’s lawsuit against the controversial organization.
Remini’s 68-Page Punch Mostly Blocked: Remember that lawsuit Remini filed against Scientology, detailing years of alleged harassment? Well, a judge just ruled that most of those claims – including targeted websites and social media attacks – are protected by the First Amendment! Ouch.
Judge Says It’s Not Technically “Illegal”: The judge basically said that while the Church’s behavior may have been unpleasant, it wasn’t necessarily illegal. He even went so far as to say calling Remini a “Nazi” (which she’s not) is free speech. Yikes.
Leah Remini revealed the moment she knew to leave the Chruch of Scientology. https://t.co/8a3YoSNm5i
— SheKnows (@SheKnows) August 3, 2023
Scientology Declares Victory: Needless to say, Scientology is celebrating this as a “resounding victory” for free speech and claims they were simply responding to Remini’s “hate speech.”
SLAPP Attack? Here’s where it gets even more complicated. The Church filed an “anti-SLAPP motion,” which is basically a legal tool to discourage lawsuits meant to silence critics through legal fees. If successful, this could mean Remini might have to pay Scientology’s legal fees! Talk about adding insult to injury.
Free Speech vs. Accountability? This ruling has major implications beyond Remini and Scientology. It raises questions about the balance between free speech and legal recourse against powerful organizations. Can someone be harassed relentlessly and have no legal leg to stand on?
Related articles
What’s Next for Remini? Remini can still appeal the judge’s decision, but this is a major setback in her fight against Scientology. Stay tuned to see how this dramatic legal battle unfolds!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YysMdeUPX1U
Discussion about this post